Mid-7-figure Texas apparel brand

Mid-7-figure Texas apparel brand: $104k in campaign revenue across 6 months at 73% open rates

A mid-7-figure Texas-based apparel brand came to us with strong campaign performance but a thin retention infrastructure underneath. Over the following nine months, we built out the full flow ecosystem, expanded the segmentation, and held open rates above 70% across more than 50 campaigns. Email’s share of business revenue climbed from ~20% at audit to ~28% in peak months.

73.2%

average campaign open rate across 59 campaigns (Nov 2025 – Apr 2026)

$104k

in campaign-attributed revenue across the same 6-month window

~20% → ~28%

of total business revenue from email, audit to peak

The brand

A mid-7-figure direct-to-consumer apparel brand based in Texas, with a strong identity built around regional design and storytelling. Total monthly revenue in the $80k-$148k range across the engagement, with consistent paid traffic feeding the site and a loyal repeat-purchase customer base. Active Klaviyo account, regular campaign sending, an existing basic flow setup at audit.

The campaigns were performing well. The brand had a clear voice and a list that engaged. The opportunity was downstream — adding the retention infrastructure to capture the value campaigns were already creating.

The gap

The initial audit showed a brand doing the visible work well, but missing the systems that compound it.

  • Flow library was thin. Welcome and Abandoned Cart existed but had been running unchanged for 1-3 years. Browse Abandonment was last updated in 2023. Back In Stock was from 2022. Missing entirely: Abandoned Checkout, Post-Purchase, Sunset, Winback, and a proper Review Request flow.

  • Pop-up was underconverting. Mobile submit rate sat at “Fair” levels, and there was no separate form for mobile vs. desktop — unusual for a brand with strong mobile traffic.

  • No SMS coordination in flows. SMS Welcome existed, but the rest of the flow ecosystem was email-only. Texas SMS regulations also required attention.

  • Email at ~20% of total revenue. A healthy floor, but well below where it could sit for a brand with this campaign performance and list quality.

  • Segmentation was static. Mostly time-based engagement segments. No customer-journey or interest-based segmentation to support deeper personalization later.

The foundation we built

We worked the systems in the order that compounded fastest.

Flow ecosystem build-out

Built or rebuilt every major automated flow with email and SMS coordination where applicable:

  • Welcome (email + SMS)

  • Abandoned Cart

  • Abandoned Checkout (new)

  • Browse Abandonment (rebuilt)

  • Back In Stock (rebuilt)

  • Post-Purchase (new)

  • Review Request + Review Posted follow-ups (new)

  • Sunset (new)

  • Winback (new)

By October 2025, the flow library was running 7+ active flows generating revenue, up from the 2-3 functional flows at audit.

Pop-up rebuild

Split the pop-up into separate mobile and desktop forms. Ran A/B tests on offer presentation, copy, and form structure. Mobile submit rate climbed from baseline through “Fair” into “Good” territory (2.07%), and desktop reached 3.19% — both rated “Good” against Klaviyo benchmarks. Zero-party data capture (style preference: Men’s/Women’s/Kid’s) integrated into the flow so future segmentation could draw on it.

Campaign rhythm and design

Established a consistent Wednesday + Friday send rhythm. Refreshed campaign templates while preserving the brand’s existing voice. Open rates held above 70% across 59 campaigns over six months — well above Klaviyo’s recommended floor of 33% and double the 40-50% range typical of healthy brands.

Segmentation expansion

Built engagement-based segments (30/60/90/180-day windows) alongside customer-journey segments. Added size-based segments for targeted campaigns (e.g., size-specific sale launches went to the right subset of the list, not the whole base).

Deliverability stewardship

Maintained deliverability through high-frequency sending periods including BFCM. Klaviyo deliverability score held at 80 (“Good”) through October 2025, with spam complaint rates consistently below 0.05% and bounce rates under 0.5%. The list could sustain the campaign volume without degrading.

The results

Over the six months from November 2025 through April 2026 — the period covering BFCM, holiday, and post-holiday — the channel delivered consistent results across seasons.

  • $104,000 in campaign-attributed revenue from 59 campaigns. 1,096 orders attributed to those sends.

  • 73.2% average open rate across the period, weighted by recipients. Open rates held above 70% in every month except February (where a few targeted small-segment sends pulled the weighted average down slightly).

  • 1.22% average click rate, sustaining above Klaviyo’s 1.20% recommended floor.

  • Email’s share of total business revenue moved from ~20% at audit to ~28-29% in peak months, with the channel consistently in the 25%+ range.

  • Total business revenue grew from $135k in August 2025 to $148k+ in October 2025 (the latest covered period in the monthly reports), with email contribution growing in parallel.

  • Pop-up submit rates moved from “Fair” to “Good” on both mobile (2.07%) and desktop (3.19%) by mid-engagement.

  • List grew from ~26,000 to ~27,000+ active subscribers across the first three months, with sustained healthy daily growth thereafter.

  • Deliverability held throughout BFCM and holiday peak frequencies. Spam complaint rates stayed below 0.05%. Bounce rates under 0.5%.

The brand kept doing what it was already doing well — strong product, consistent paid traffic, distinctive design. Email became the channel that captured and compounded the value of all of it.

Why it worked

  • The campaigns were already good. We didn’t break them. The team had a voice and a rhythm that was working. The job was to add the infrastructure around it, not to rewrite what was already converting.

  • Flow build-out before any complexity layer. Filling out the core 5 systems (capture, welcome, abandonment, post-purchase, winback) before any logic-heavy personalization or AI-driven segmentation. Touchpoints compound when each one is structurally sound.

  • Deliverability stewardship at scale. Holding 73%+ open rates across 59 campaigns over six months — including BFCM peak frequency — is a deliverability story, not a content story. The list stayed clean, the sending pattern stayed consistent, and the inbox kept letting us in.

  • Segmentation built to serve flows, not the other way around. New segments were built when a flow or campaign needed them, not in advance. Avoided the trap of overbuilding the targeting infrastructure before there was anything to target with.

Book a call

Book a 30 minute call so I (Nick) can understand what you’re looking for, and if I can help.

More case studies